Pre-Course Set Up#26
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Closed
4 tasks
09b5964 to
b569585
Compare
4 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
@ahmagdy @urbanogilson you reviewed the last version of this pr i made (#11) if you'd be happy to review this again now it's complete 🙇 |
urbanogilson
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2025
ahmagdy
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2025
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@adamblanchard, I can't find where we use this image in the repo, as well as a few others. Also, it could benefit from compression and webp format. Would it make sense to create a task to review all assets like this?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added the "Pre-Course" course, as described in the proposal.
This pr contains:
Context regarding "technical application" - they have previously been created in gitbook by staff, and sent to applicants that way. I have not decided against doing that, but for transparency and better source control, I'm pulling the content into this repo. I have made some structural changes to the markdown files, but no content changes.
What I need reviewing: